Study Compares Survival Outcomes Using Different Cancer Staging Methods
By MedImaging International staff writers Posted on 05 Oct 2016 |
Image: An artist’s rendition showing lung cancer (Photo courtesy of Dreamstime).
Researchers in the Netherlands have compared five-year survival rates for mediastinal nodal lung cancer staging, after treatment with endosonography or mediastinoscopy.
The results of the study were published in the September 13, 2016, issue of the journal JAMA. Accurate mediastinal nodal staging directs therapy, and provides prognostic value during the management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).
The Assessment of Surgical Staging vs Endosonographic Ultrasound in Lung Cancer (ASTER) trial compared an endosonographic staging strategy with surgical staging using mediastinoscopy. Endosonography combines endobronchial, and transesophageal ultrasound, and is followed up using mediastinoscopy, in case the results are negative.
The researchers evaluated 241 patients suffering from potentially resectable NSCLC, in 4 tertiary referral centers. There were 123 patients randomized to endosonographic staging, and 118 patients to surgical staging. The researchers found that endosonography was significantly more sensitive (97%) during the diagnosis of mediastinal nodal metastases, compared to surgical staging (79%).
The five-year survival rate was 35% for both the endosonographic and surgical strategies. The estimated median survival for the endosonographic strategy was 31 months compared to 33 months for the surgical strategy. The researchers concluded that improved mediastinal staging could ensure better treatment for a larger number of patients, and could increase the long-term survival rates of the patients.
Jouke T. Annema, MD, PhD, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (Amsterdam, Netherlands), said, "Why did improved mediastinal staging not lead to improved survival? Missing data occurred in less than 2 percent and therefore are an unlikely source of bias. However, ASTER was powered to detect a difference in diagnostic sensitivity, not survival, as reflected by the wide confidence intervals. If a survival difference between the strategies exists, it is likely to be small and a larger sample size may be needed to detect it. However, randomized trials to detect a survival difference based on staging strategy are not likely to be conducted as the endosonographic strategy is now advised in clinical guidelines."
Related Links:
Academic Medical Center
The results of the study were published in the September 13, 2016, issue of the journal JAMA. Accurate mediastinal nodal staging directs therapy, and provides prognostic value during the management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).
The Assessment of Surgical Staging vs Endosonographic Ultrasound in Lung Cancer (ASTER) trial compared an endosonographic staging strategy with surgical staging using mediastinoscopy. Endosonography combines endobronchial, and transesophageal ultrasound, and is followed up using mediastinoscopy, in case the results are negative.
The researchers evaluated 241 patients suffering from potentially resectable NSCLC, in 4 tertiary referral centers. There were 123 patients randomized to endosonographic staging, and 118 patients to surgical staging. The researchers found that endosonography was significantly more sensitive (97%) during the diagnosis of mediastinal nodal metastases, compared to surgical staging (79%).
The five-year survival rate was 35% for both the endosonographic and surgical strategies. The estimated median survival for the endosonographic strategy was 31 months compared to 33 months for the surgical strategy. The researchers concluded that improved mediastinal staging could ensure better treatment for a larger number of patients, and could increase the long-term survival rates of the patients.
Jouke T. Annema, MD, PhD, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (Amsterdam, Netherlands), said, "Why did improved mediastinal staging not lead to improved survival? Missing data occurred in less than 2 percent and therefore are an unlikely source of bias. However, ASTER was powered to detect a difference in diagnostic sensitivity, not survival, as reflected by the wide confidence intervals. If a survival difference between the strategies exists, it is likely to be small and a larger sample size may be needed to detect it. However, randomized trials to detect a survival difference based on staging strategy are not likely to be conducted as the endosonographic strategy is now advised in clinical guidelines."
Related Links:
Academic Medical Center
Latest Ultrasound News
- Largest Model Trained On Echocardiography Images Assesses Heart Structure and Function
- Groundbreaking Technology Enables Precise, Automatic Measurement of Peripheral Blood Vessels
- Deep Learning Advances Super-Resolution Ultrasound Imaging
- Novel Ultrasound-Launched Targeted Nanoparticle Eliminates Biofilm and Bacterial Infection
- AI-Guided Ultrasound System Enables Rapid Assessments of DVT
- Focused Ultrasound Technique Gets Quality Assurance Protocol
- AI-Guided Handheld Ultrasound System Helps Capture Diagnostic-Quality Cardiac Images
- Non-Invasive Ultrasound Imaging Device Diagnoses Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease
- Wearable Ultrasound Platform Paves Way for 24/7 Blood Pressure Monitoring On the Wrist
- Diagnostic Ultrasound Enhancing Agent to Improve Image Quality in Pediatric Heart Patients
- AI Detects COVID-19 in Lung Ultrasound Images
- New Ultrasound Technology to Revolutionize Respiratory Disease Diagnoses
- Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Highly Useful For Interventions
- Ultrasensitive Broadband Transparent Ultrasound Transducer Enhances Medical Diagnosis
- Artificial Intelligence Detects Heart Defects in Newborns from Ultrasound Images
- Ultrasound Imaging Technology Allows Doctors to Watch Spinal Cord Activity during Surgery