MedImaging

Download Mobile App
Recent News Radiography MRI Ultrasound Nuclear Medicine General/Advanced Imaging Imaging IT Industry News

Grading System Designed to Assess Patient Reactions to Radiotherapy

By MedImaging International staff writers
Posted on 15 Oct 2013
Print article
A novel study was designed to assess the effectiveness of different systems used by caregivers to evaluate toxicity for patients receiving radiation therapy.

The study, conducted by researchers from North Shore-Long Island Jewish (LIJ) Health System (New Hyde Park, NY, USA), was presented at the 55th annual meeting of the American Society of Therapeutic Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), held September 2013 in Atlanta (GA, USA).

During the course of radiation therapy, patients may experience reactions to their treatments. Typically, the severity of reactions is assessed by a radiation oncologist and nurse using a formal grading scheme. Research conducted by North Shore-LIJ’s radiation oncologists evaluated the reliability of these grading systems by independent caregivers. The study assessed whether independent caregivers would assign the same grade to the same adverse reaction using a common grading scheme. Images of breasts that had undergone radiation in 30 breast cancer patients on skin care protocols were presented to radiation oncologists and nurses who were asked to assign grades independently based on their evaluation of the images and provide feedback explaining their choices. The assessments were then analyzed and the level of agreement among caregivers was determined using statistical methods.

As presented at ASTRO, the study determined that overall there was a significantly better agreement in the assessments based on the use of the Common-Terminology-Criteria-for-Adverse Events (CTCAE) scale, which was developed by the National Cancer Institute to standardize the assignment of grades across various caregivers. Analysis of the comments provided by the caregivers revealed a reliance on assessment criteria that was not necessarily explicit in the grading definitions.

“Establishing the reliability of the scale used to assess adverse reactions among different caregivers is an important step to enhance uniformity and consistency of the care to our patients,” said Ajay Kapur, PhD, lead author of the study and director of medical physics research and education in the North Shore-LIJ department of radiation medicine. “The specific grading scheme used must demonstrate a high level of reliability amongst various caregivers.”

The study’s senior author and chair of radiation medicine, Louis Potters, MD, said, “In order to deliver the highest quality of care to our patients, we all need to speak the same language. This study enhances our ability to provide Consistent care to all our patients and further validates the CTCAE grading system.”

Related Links:
North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System



Silver Member
X-Ray QA Meter
T3 AD Pro
New
Specimen Radiography System
Trident HD
New
Ultrasound Needle Guide
Ultra-Pro 3
Radiology Software
DxWorks

Print article

Channels

MRI

view channel
Image: The AI tool can help interpret and assess how well treatments are working for MS patients (Photo courtesy of Shutterstock)

AI Tool Tracks Effectiveness of Multiple Sclerosis Treatments Using Brain MRI Scans

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a condition in which the immune system attacks the brain and spinal cord, leading to impairments in movement, sensation, and cognition. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) markers... Read more

Imaging IT

view channel
Image: The new Medical Imaging Suite makes healthcare imaging data more accessible, interoperable and useful (Photo courtesy of Google Cloud)

New Google Cloud Medical Imaging Suite Makes Imaging Healthcare Data More Accessible

Medical imaging is a critical tool used to diagnose patients, and there are billions of medical images scanned globally each year. Imaging data accounts for about 90% of all healthcare data1 and, until... Read more