MedImaging

Download Mobile App
Recent News Radiography MRI Ultrasound Nuclear Medicine General/Advanced Imaging Imaging IT Industry News

New Guidelines on MRI Safety and Compatibility of Medical Devices

By MedImaging International staff writers
Posted on 13 Jan 2015
Print article
Image: Endovascular grafts, such as W.L. Gore’s TAG thoracic endoprosthesis, are among the “passive” implants subject to the new guidance (Photo courtesy of Gore Medical).
Image: Endovascular grafts, such as W.L. Gore’s TAG thoracic endoprosthesis, are among the “passive” implants subject to the new guidance (Photo courtesy of Gore Medical).
The US Food and Drug Administration issued new guidance recommendations on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compatibility—or in some instances, incompatibility—of implants that do not require electricity to service their function, such as intracranial aneurysm clips, cardiovascular stents, endovascular grafts, and transprostatic tissue retractors.

The topic of MRI-safe devices, up to now, has mostly centered on devices such as pacemakers, and more recently cochlear implants, both of which use electronics. Now, however, the FDA (Silver Spring, MD, USA) has three principal concerns about patient safety in regards to these so-called “passive” implants in the MRI setting: the displacement forces and torques on magnetic substances, which can turn devices into deadly projectiles; radiofrequency heating that can burn patients; and the distorting effect of implants upon an MRI scan. The FDA recommends four tests described by standard setting institution, American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International, to tackle these three safety issues, and provides additional details about the way those tests should be performed. For example, the guidance reported that “the testing should encompass the range of sizes of the device you intend to market.”

MRI scans are provided in various magnetic field strengths, measured in Teslas. “Although commercial 1.5 T MR systems are currently the most common, 3 T MR systems are becoming more common. A medical device that is classified as MR Conditional in a 1.5 T scanner may not be safe to scan in an MR system with a higher or lower field strength,” the guidance cautioned.

The implant’s labeling should describe the device as “MR Safe,” “MR Unsafe,” or “MR Conditional,” as defined by ASTM International in standard F2503-13. Lastly, the fourth category, “Safety in MRI Not Evaluated,” may be suitable in some instances, but not for those passive implants that are known to present MRI compatibility issues, are a new device type or contain ferromagnetic materials.

Related Links:

US Food and Drug Administration


Gold Member
Solid State Kv/Dose Multi-Sensor
AGMS-DM+
New
Wireless Handheld Ultrasound System
TE Air
Ultrasound Needle Guide
Ultra-Pro II
New
Color Doppler Ultrasound System
KC20

Print article

Channels

Ultrasound

view channel
Image: CAM figures of testing images (Photo courtesy of SPJ; DOI:10.34133/research.0319)

Diagnostic System Automatically Analyzes TTE Images to Identify Congenital Heart Disease

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is one of the most prevalent congenital anomalies worldwide, presenting substantial health and financial challenges for affected patients. Early detection and treatment of... Read more

Nuclear Medicine

view channel
Image: Whole-body maximum-intensity projections over time after [68Ga]Ga-DPI-4452 administration (Photo courtesy of SNMMI)

New PET Agent Rapidly and Accurately Visualizes Lesions in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients

Clear cell renal cell cancer (ccRCC) represents 70-80% of renal cell carcinoma cases. While localized disease can be effectively treated with surgery and ablative therapies, one-third of patients either... Read more

Imaging IT

view channel
Image: The new Medical Imaging Suite makes healthcare imaging data more accessible, interoperable and useful (Photo courtesy of Google Cloud)

New Google Cloud Medical Imaging Suite Makes Imaging Healthcare Data More Accessible

Medical imaging is a critical tool used to diagnose patients, and there are billions of medical images scanned globally each year. Imaging data accounts for about 90% of all healthcare data1 and, until... Read more