We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

MedImaging

Download Mobile App
Recent News Radiography MRI Ultrasound Nuclear Medicine General/Advanced Imaging Imaging IT Industry News

AI-Powered Chest X-Ray Analysis Shows Promise in Clinical Practice

By MedImaging International staff writers
Posted on 27 Aug 2024

Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have fueled interest in computer-assisted diagnosis, driven by growing radiology workloads, a global shortage of radiologists, and the potential for burnout. Radiology departments often encounter a high volume of unremarkable chest X-rays, and AI has the potential to enhance efficiency by automating the reporting process. A new study has demonstrated that off-label use of a commercial AI tool is effective in excluding pathology with equal or fewer critical misses compared to radiologists.

Researchers from Herlev Gentofte Hospital (Copenhagen, Denmark) conducted a study to determine how often AI could accurately identify unremarkable chest X-rays without increasing diagnostic errors. This study analyzed radiology reports and data from 1,961 patients (median age, 72 years; 993 females), each with a single chest X-ray, collected from four Danish hospitals. Previous research indicated that AI tools could confidently exclude pathology in chest X-rays and autonomously generate a normal report. Yet, there was no established threshold for when AI tools should be considered reliable.


Image: Four examples of remarkable chest X-rays with missed critical findings (Photo courtesy of Radiology; https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.240272)
Image: Four examples of remarkable chest X-rays with missed critical findings (Photo courtesy of Radiology; https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.240272)

The study aimed to compare the severity of errors made by AI with those made by human radiologists to determine if AI errors were objectively worse. The AI tool calculated a "remarkableness" probability for each X-ray to determine its specificity at various sensitivity levels. Two chest radiologists, blind to AI assessments, categorized the X-rays as "remarkable" or "unremarkable" using established criteria. X-rays with missed findings by either AI or human reports were evaluated by another chest radiologist, who was unaware of who made the error, and classified the misses as critical, clinically significant, or insignificant.

The standard reference found 1,231 of the 1,961 X-rays (62.8%) remarkable and 730 (37.2%) unremarkable. The results, published in the journal Radiology, indicated that the AI tool successfully excluded pathology in 24.5% to 52.7% of unremarkable chest X-rays at sensitivities of 98% or higher, with fewer critical misses than those in the associated radiology reports. However, the mistakes made by AI were generally more severe clinically than those made by radiologists. The study suggested that AI could autonomously report over half of all normal chest X-rays, but emphasized the need for a prospective implementation study of the model at one of the suggested thresholds before recommending widespread use.

Related Links:
Herlev Gentofte Hospital


New
Gold Member
X-Ray QA Meter
T3 AD Pro
1.5T MRI Scanner
MAGNETOM Amira
New
Frontal Apron
601 - Frontal Apron
1.5T Superconducting MRI System
uMR 680

Latest Radiography News

AI Model Identifies Vertebral Compression Fractures in Chest Radiographs

Advanced 3D Mammography Detects More Breast Cancers

AI X-Ray Diagnostic Tool Offers Rapid Pediatric Fracture Detection