We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

MedImaging

Download Mobile App
Recent News Radiography MRI Ultrasound Nuclear Medicine General/Advanced Imaging Imaging IT Industry News

Using Portable Ultrasound to Identify Possible Heart Attacks and Strokes Before Symptoms Arise

By MedImaging International staff writers
Posted on 19 Jan 2015
A study of portable ultrasound performed in the United States, Canada, and India has revealed the potential of this technology for identifying plaques in peripheral arteries that can lead to heart attacks and stroke before symptoms occur, in both developed and developing country environments, allowing preventive treatment in those affected.

The study, published December 2014 in Global Heart, the journal of the World Heart Federation, was conducted by Dr. Ram Bedi, affiliate assistant professor, department of bioengineering, University of Washington (Seattle, WA, USA), and Prof. Jagat Narula, editor-in-chief of Global Heart and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (New York, NY, USA), and colleagues.

Image: An abnormal Echocardiogram. Image shows a mid-muscular ventricular septal defect. The trace in the lower left shows the cardiac cycle and the red mark the time in the cardiac cycle that the image was captured. Colors are used to represent the velocity and direction of blood flow (Photo courtesy of Wikipedia).
Image: An abnormal Echocardiogram. Image shows a mid-muscular ventricular septal defect. The trace in the lower left shows the cardiac cycle and the red mark the time in the cardiac cycle that the image was captured. Colors are used to represent the velocity and direction of blood flow (Photo courtesy of Wikipedia).

Many research studies have shown that it is possible to evaluate subclinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) using ultrasound imaging. Because more portable and lower cost ultrasound devices are now available, combined with increased automation and enhancements, it may be possible in the near future to typically examine people with ultrasound to establish any ASCVD present before symptoms arise, so that future disease can be prevented, for example using medication. In this study, ASCVD was determined using ultrasound of both the carotid arteries and the ileofemoral arteries. The findings were summarized in an easy to understand index called the Fuster-Narula (FUN) Score.


Data were gathered from four cohorts, two Indian and two North American. In India, a medical camp setting was used, and screening with automated ultrasound imaging was conducted over eight days in 941 comparatively young (mean age 44 years, 34% female) asymptomatic volunteers recruited from the semi-urban town of Sirsa (Haryana) and urban city of Jaipur (Rajasthan) in northern India. The cohort from Sirsa was specifically recruited because all participants had already undergone aggressive lifestyle changes (smoking cessation, no alcohol, vegetarian diet, physically active lifestyles, daily meditation), radiology resident physicians who had no earlier training in vascular ultrasound were trained right on the spot to perform the ultrasound examinations.

To compare the imaging findings with traditional risk factors, two cohorts (481 persons) were recruited from primary care clinics in North America (one in Richmond, TX, USA, the other in Toronto, Canada). As well as the same ultrasound examinations given in the Indian cohort, comprehensive ASCVD risk factor information collected from these participants, all of whom were self-referred asymptomatic individuals (mean age 60 years, 39% female). Data collected included cholesterol levels, blood pressure, glucose level, weight, height, smoking and family history. These people were attending clinics for routine health examinations in most cases. Effectiveness of established ASCVD prevention guidelines was then compared to findings from direct imaging; ultrasound was performed by trained experts at each center.

In India, ultrasound revealed plaques in at least one artery in almost a quarter (24%) of those examined; 107 (11%) had plaques in only the carotids, 70 (7%) in both the carotids and iliofemoral arteries, and 47 (5%) had plaques in only the iliofemoral arteries. If just the carotids had been examined, 177 (19%) of the asymptomatic individuals would have been identified with plaques; by adding the iliofemoral examination, 47 additional individuals (5% of the total) were identified with plaque. Older age and male sex were associated with the presence of plaque both in urban and semi-urban populations (the much higher levels of smoking in men could account for their higher risk).

Data from the American and Canadian clinics showed that 203 subjects (42%) had carotid plaque; 166 of these (82% of those with plaque) would not have qualified for lipid-lowering therapy such as statins under the most widely used guidelines known as ATP III (Third Report of the Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults [Adult Treatment Panel]) guidelines. Using the recently published, more rigid ATP IV guidelines, 67 people (one-third of those with plaque and 14% of the total US/Canadian cohort) individuals with carotid plaque would also have failed to qualify for treatment.

Furthermore, the study revealed 34 individuals in the United States and Canada who qualified for treatment under ATP III but did not have any plaques, and this number increased to 81 under ATP IV (if receiving treatment such as statins, these people could be said to be overtreated, since no plaques were seen).

The investigators reported, “Our study shows that automation in ultrasound imaging technology allows even non-expert users to rapidly evaluate the presence of subclinical atherosclerosis in a large population. Detection of subclinical atherosclerosis is further enhanced by inclusion of the iliofemoral artery examination. It seems that plaque information from ultrasound images may serve as a guide for initiating medical intervention regardless of the availability or knowledge of traditional risk factors. Our results further suggest that not only in low- and middle-income countries, but even in the developed nations, ultrasound images may help refine strategies for medical intervention. It might however still be too contentious to suggest that risk factors-positive and imaging-negative asymptomatic subjects may be spared from medical intervention. Conversely, arguments against initiating medical intervention on risk factors-negative and imaging-positive asymptomatic subjects become harder to justify.”

In a linked comment published with this article, Dr. Tasneem Z. Naqvi, professor of medicine at the Mayo College of Medicine and division of cardiology (Scottsdale, AZ, USA), added, “This study shows that the assessment of subclinical atherosclerosis by a portable, user-friendly bedside tool is feasible in large populations and the technique of carotid ultrasound imaging and IMT assessment could be adopted by novices after an eight-hour crash course. The study by Bedi et al puts into perspective the weakness of risk factor-based approach to identify individuals with subclinical atherosclerosis who are more likely to develop future cardiovascular events. The study shows that the vascular ultrasound imaging technology is ripe and that the previously existing barriers such as poor resolution, cumbersome protocols, need for off line processing and need for expert performer no longer exist. The question that this study does not address—and perhaps no study in future might—is whether this imaging based approach would save more lives than the risk-based approach. We need to ponder if treating nearly 50% of the adults with statins with a risk scoring algorithm [as happens in the United States] is more appropriate versus treating only those who have subclinical atherosclerosis based on comprehensive and readily available, cheap and simple screening method. This study makes a compelling argument in favor of imaging for screening.”

In an additional comment, Prof. Paul Leeson, a member of the Imaging Enhancement Expert Working Group for UK Biobank (with specific responsibility for the vascular imaging component), professor of cardiovascular medicine at the University of Oxford and Clinical director of the Oxford Cardiovascular Clinical Research Facility (UK), and not connected to the study or the journal, stated, “Ultrasound seems to be firmly establishing itself as the advanced imaging technology of choice for global health care issues. Current ultrasound scanners generate accurate cardiovascular measures safely, rapidly, and relatively inexpensively. This paper nicely demonstrates how people with little imaging experience can undergo a short training program and then use portable ultrasound systems in a wide variety of global healthcare settings. The fact this imaging technology can be applied to large populations has also made it an attractive option for many of the major biobank research projects, such as UK Biobank. These projects are planned to generate vascular images for hundreds of thousands of individuals in different countries that, over the next few years, can be used to determine the true value of vascular imaging for disease prediction.”

Related Links:

University of Washington
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai



New
Gold Member
X-Ray QA Meter
T3 AD Pro
Silver Member
Radiographic Positioning Equipment
2-Step Multiview Positioning Platform
Opaque X-Ray Mobile Lead Barrier
2594M
Imaging Table
CFPM201

Latest Ultrasound News

Wearable Ultrasound Patch Enables Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring

AI Image-Recognition Program Reads Echocardiograms Faster, Cuts Results Wait Time

Ultrasound Device Non-Invasively Improves Blood Circulation in Lower Limbs